Skip to Content

Get $100,000 Tax-Free Annually in Retirement

Some tax strategies are so common most people know about them. Why is it then almost nobody is using the strategy?

A large part of my tax practice is consulting. There isn’t much room for more tax preparation clients. However, I love helping people reduce their taxes, so I spend considerable time outside tax season working with good people designing strategies tailored to their personal needs.

The past several months I have repeated the tax break in question countless times. It is missed nearly 100% of the time. Of my regular tax clients, the ones using this strategy did so at my encouragement. 

It started earlier this year when I published this post on traditional retirement accounts and how they have an implied interest rate on the tax savings. Before that I published this post because I was seeing consulting clients who had rather large retirement accounts at a young age.

It is to be expected in a community of savers and investors to have large retirement accounts at an early age. My lament was about how big those accounts were going to get and the loss of control over tax issues in the future as a result. 

When the accountant loses control over managing your taxes it means you pay more. This might not seem like a such a big deal because these people have a large amount of liquid investments, much of it in traditional retirement accounts, and can afford to pay more in taxes. But people don’t stop by this place to hear they need to pay more. 

Folks around the FI (financial independence) and FIRE (financial independence/retire early) communities tend to max out tax deductions up front so they can build their net worth faster. I cautioned against this knee-jerk reaction.

Most people in these communities would be hard pressed to give the appropriate amount to invest in a Roth versus a traditional retirement account for their optimum tax advantage over their lifetime. At Camp Accountant I discussed the issue further.

The more I thought about the issue of large traditional retirement account balances the more I realized this was not just a wealthy person issue. There is a tax strategy with the ability to make a real difference for people even in lower tax brackets, in fact, any tax bracket.



The problem is the required minimum distribution (RMD). Before the RMD kicks in at 70 1/2 you retain control over your tax situation by making choices best for you. In the earlier posts I outlined how some people with modest traditional retirement account balances would see very large balances after another 30 years of growth. I illustrated an example of a client facing $500,000 in RMDs down the road. There isn’t much tax planning you can do after that.

Of course, many readers felt this was not a real world issue. It is, but not for many. 

Charitable giving, like this animal shelter, has never paid so well. Make a difference that really counts.

The problem with the RMD is loss of control. Once you reach 70 1/2 you have until April 1st of the following year to distribute a certain amount from your traditional retirement accounts. If you wait until the following year you need to take out double that year. Therefore, for most, it is best to start taking the RMD the year you reach 70 1/2.

The RMD is required every year you have a traditional retirement account once you reach 70 1/2. The Secure Act working its way through Congress could delay the RMD until age 72, but that has not yet happened. If you are still working you can delay the RMD for money in the 401(k) where you work, with some restrictions.

The RMD can do serious tax damage. For example, if your only income is Social Security and an RMD from your retirement account of $40,000, some of your Social Security benefits will be taxed. Worse, you could pay more for Medicare coverage the following year.

By age 70 you are probably not itemizing. The house is paid off so all that remains is state and local taxes (SALT), which are capped at $10,000 per return, and charitable contributions. Yes, if you have really high out of pocket health insurance and medical expenses you might get a deduction there, but it is really hard to get the deduction as the first 10% of adjusted gross income (AGI) needs to be exceeded before you can claim any of the healthcare expense.

If you donate large amounts to charity there is another problem. The RMD increases your taxes and could turn some of your Social Security benefits taxable as well. Then you need to exceed the standard deduction ($24,400 for joint returns/$12,200 for singles for 2019) before any of the charitable deduction counts.

And that is where out tax strategy shows up.


The Gift that Keeps on Giving

Under current tax law you can give to charity directly from your traditional retirement account (tIRA, SEP and SIMPLE, including inactive SEP and SIMPLE plans that no longer receive contributions), up to $100,000 per year, per person, once you reach age 70 1/2. If you are not this old yet you certainly have friends, family and neighbors who are and they need to hear about this.

Money sent directly to a charity from your traditional retirement account is excluded from income up to the $100,000 limit!

For this to work the retirement plan administrator must send the money directly to the charity. You will still get a 1099-R at the end of the year. Nothing on the tax document tells you how much was sent directly to the charity so you must tell your tax professional the amount to get the tax break. My office tax software has a “special situations” page I go to on the 1099-R screen to enter the amount to exclude from income. 

This is important. While only a few will suffer the consequences I outlined in prior posts, many will pay at least some tax on their RMD. Many will also end up paying tax on up to 85% of their Social Security benefits and pay more in Medicare premiums than they have to.

Let me clear up a few points before continuing. You can have more than the RMD sent to the charity from your retirement account. The limit is $100,000 per person, per year, as stated above, that can be excluded from income each year, even if your RMD is lower. If you give more than the RMD, the excess will not lower the next year RMD, but is still excluded from income up to to the limit. The RMD is still required in subsequent years without regard to prior distributions in excess of the RMD in past years.



There are no drawbacks from using this tax strategy. The qualified charitable distribution (QCD), as this strategy is called, is excluded from income, never reaching the front page of Form 1040. This means that your income is lower. Your Medicare premium may be lower as a result and Social Security benefits might be taxed less or not at all.

There are other issues on your tax return that might be affected as well. Your facts and circumstances will determine those additional tax savings.

There is one lifestyle change required if you are donating to your church, synagogue or other religious organization. You should make your donation via your traditional retirement account, up to $100,000, to your church. No more money in the plate on Sunday (or whichever day you have services). This means you will not be tossing an envelope in the plate at the service. It’s no big deal because the additional tax savings mean you can fund your religious organization more from the tax savings. But it might feel weird not donating to church each week when the plate is passed.

You must be 70 1/2 or older at the time of the donation, not just the year you reach 70 1/2. If you reach 70 1/2 on November 18th, then the first day you can gift with a QCD is November 18th.

Be sure the charity gives you a receipt for the donation. You will need it for your tax records should you be audited.


Who Can You Donate To?

This is where it gets fun. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) allows a wide range of organizations you can donate to under a QCD, as listed under IRC Section 170(c). Here is the list in English:

  • A U.S. state, possession, the District of Columbia and the United States federal government itself. Yes, the government will give you a tax break for giving all the money to them. Just had to get that out of the way.
  • Any community chest, corporation, trust, fund or foundation (organized or created in the U.S.), operating exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, scientific, or literary purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals. 
  • Your church, synagogue or other religious organization.
  • War veterans’ organization or its post, auxiliary, trust, or foundation organized in the United States or its possessions.
  • Nonprofit volunteer fire companies.
  • Certain civil defense organizations.
  • Domestic fraternal societies (operating under the lodge system), if the contribution is used exclusively for charitable purposes.
  • A nonprofit cemetery company in some instances.


Part of your legacy planning starts long before your leave this world. You can make a difference. You built wealth with hard work, frugal living and prudent investing. These skills mean you are unlikely to spend it all. By giving to worthy charities of your choice you can enjoy the fruits of your giving by seeing your donations in action.

By using the QCD tax strategy you can reduce your taxes, reduce or avoid taxes on Social Security benefits and potentially reduce your Medicare premiums. This means you will have a larger legacy for your loved ones or to fund charitable causes dear to your heart at a greater level. 

You worked hard for your money. Now you can make a bigger difference than ever. The pay-it-forward revolution starts here.



More Wealth Building Resources

Personal Capital is an incredible tool to manage all your investments in one place. You can watch your net worth grow as you reach toward financial independence and beyond. Did I mention Personal Capital is free?

Side Hustle Selling tradelines yields a high return compared to time invested, as much as $1,000 per hour. The tradeline company I use is Tradeline Supply Company. Let Darren know you are from The Wealthy Accountant. Call 888-844-8910, email or read my review.

Medi-Share is a low cost way to manage health care costs. As health insurance premiums continue to sky rocket, there is an alternative preserving the wealth of families all over America. Here is my review of Medi-Share and additional resources to bring health care under control in your household.

QuickBooks is a daily part of life in my office. Managing a business requires accurate books without wasting time. QuickBooks is an excellent tool for managing your business, rental properties, side hustle and personal finances.

cost segregation study can reduce taxes $100,000 for income property owners. Here is my review of how cost segregation studies work and how to get one yourself.

Worthy Financial offers a flat 5% on their investment. You can read my review here. 

Christopher Hipskind

Saturday 23rd of November 2019

Ok.. Stupid question. Forgive me please for not understanding.

You mentioned security income plus $40k RMD for a total income of maybe $100k? (Married couple?)

Now how much tax and extra Medicare premiums would you pay on that?

Enough to consider donating $40k instead?

What am I misunderstanding ?

Keith Taxguy

Sunday 24th of November 2019

The Medicare premium savings are always nice, but certainly not enough to offset the entire charitable contribution. Social Security benefits will also be taxed less under the example.

This strategy isn't going to give you more than a 100% return on the charitable contribution. If you already have a charitable slant this is a nice way to do to maximize your tax savings, allowing for more philanthropic activity. If you also have a Roth IRA, you have access to more funds without tax issues. The biggest issue is how the tIRA is taxed as ordinary income. If you don't pay it your beneficiaries will and they will not have this option.


Tuesday 19th of November 2019

This was very helpful, as I was starting to worry a bit about this after your last article on the subject. While I am planning to max out my 401k this year, and my husband has upped his contributions to his 403b, I have stopped short of getting to the point where we max out his as well as mine. It is hard to figure out where we might end up as far as the RMD because it is hard to predict the future return of the stock market. No matter if you assume an 8% return or follow the train of thought that the future returns might be closer to 4%, they are all still just a big guess when you could contribute and invest for another 20-30yrs. I like having a back up plan that would allow me to direct where the excess money might go without triggering a larger tax liability (or more importantly damaging my Medicare premiums in retirement). I'm not exactly counting on social security money anyway.

Keith Taxguy

Tuesday 19th of November 2019

Previous posts had clients asking for solutions which led to this post, J. For most people this is a viable and powerful solution.


Monday 18th of November 2019

I see now that you definitely cant do QCD to DAF. However, I don't think you have to account for QCD in excess of RMD in a given year against upcoming eoy balance for computing the RMD. So QCD in excess of RMD doesn't directly offset future RMDs, but indirectly a big QCD (relative to account balance) could certainly lower future RMDs, especially over time. Would be more attractive to do a big one in a given year if it could go to your DAF.

Keith Taxguy

Monday 18th of November 2019

I was going to mention that, but it muddies the waters so much. To be clear, your RMD is based on the value of all your traditional IRAs on December 31st of the prior year. Distributions affect the balance at the end of the year and, hence, affect the following year's RMD. However, the RMD for any year cannot be reduced by any excess distributions from tIRAs in prior years.

Dave Mitch

Monday 18th of November 2019

For the problem cited of being 65 and having. very large IRA’s creating large future RMD, what about doing a very large Roth conversion now ($500k/yr) to reduce the RMD’s. A big tax hit now, but reduce the future RMD’s which all will come with high tax rates. (Assumes you have the cash to pay the tax bills now). The 2025 reversion to the old tax rates is another reason this would make sense.

The Money Commando

Tuesday 19th of November 2019

It seems that the smarter thing to do would be to strategically do a Roth conversion in years that you have lower income. For people in the FIRE community, this would be the years after you retire, or during extended breaks from working. Just wait until the end of the year when you have a pretty good idea what your income for the year is going to be, then convert the maximum amount necessary to keep you in whatever tax bracket you want to stay in (although honestly, the differences between incremental dollars being taxed at 24% vs. 22% doesn't matter much, but it's much more interesting if you're crossing from the 24% bracket into the 32% bracket).

Keith Taxguy

Monday 18th of November 2019

That is certainly an option, Dave. It still requires a large tax bill. Depending on your facts and circumstances will determine the level you wish to engage this. Remember, it is not an all-or-none game. You can convert an appropriate amount into a Roth without obligation to convert the remainder.


Monday 18th of November 2019

Did not know this, so you've got to track it? Also, I assume since it has to go "straight to the charity" you can't send it to your DAF (even though that is considered as going to the charity in the year it was contributed to the DAF)?

If you give more than the RMD, the excess will not lower the next year RMD, but is still excluded from income up to to the limit. The RMD is still required in subsequent years without regard to prior distributions in excess of the RMD in past years.